BBG News

Board of Directors vs Owner: What to Know About Resolving Condo Disputes

Nov 4, 2025

Even in well-managed buildings, tension between condo boards and owners can surface quickly. From maintenance complaints to questions of authority, misunderstandings often grow into serious legal or financial conflicts. Understanding the dynamics of board of directors vs. owner disputes helps both sides protect their interests and find fair, efficient ways to restore community harmony.

Why Board-Owner Disputes Arise

Disputes between boards and owners often stem from personal and procedural issues. The most common flashpoints include assessments, maintenance, building rules, and transparency concerns. Assessment and Fee Disputes arise when owners question increases in common charges or refuse to pay, sometimes believing the board mismanaged funds. Property maintenance and Repair Issues occur when it’s unclear who is responsible for fixing a leak, window replacement, or structural damage.

Other frequent friction points involve bylaw enforcement—rules about pets, noise, renovations, or short-term rentals—and access to records, such as financial statements or meeting minutes. When communication breaks down, what began as a single complaint can evolve into a complex board of directors and owner dispute.

Boards must remember that even well-intentioned actions can appear opaque to owners without proper documentation and open dialogue. Transparent policies and proactive communication are the first lines of defense in preventing condo board disputes.

The Board’s Fiduciary Duties and Role in Conflict Resolution

Every board member serves as a fiduciary of the condominium association, meaning they must act in the best interest of the entire ownership, not themselves or a select group. This duty includes loyalty, care, and obedience to the governing documents and applicable law.

When disagreements arise, the board’s responsibility is not just to enforce rules but also to ensure fairness, consistency, and legal compliance. For example, selective enforcement, allowing one owner to break a rule while penalizing another, can expose the board to claims of discrimination or breach of fiduciary duty.

Boards should also keep clear records of decisions, especially those involving fines, assessments, or access restrictions. These documents demonstrate that decisions were made transparently and within authority, which is critical evidence if board disputes with owners ever escalate into legal proceedings.

Common Board vs. Owner Disputes

In the landscape of board of directors vs owners conflicts, certain patterns recur across New York City’s condominiums and co-ops. Understanding these scenarios helps new directors navigate their roles effectively.

Financial and Operational Disputes

  • Assessment or Fee Disagreements: Owners may challenge increases in maintenance fees or special assessments, claiming poor financial management.
  • Maintenance and Repair Responsibilities: Disputes often arise over who pays for repairs affecting both common and private areas.
  • Access to Records: Transparency issues surface when owners are denied access to financial reports or meeting minutes.

Governance and Authority Conflicts

  • Bylaw and Rule Enforcement: From pet bans to renovation approvals, inconsistent enforcement can lead to resentment and liability.
  • Authority Challenges: Some owners question whether the board exceeded its legal powers or failed to follow procedural requirements.
  • Election and Governance Disputes: Proxy voting, candidate eligibility, or procedural irregularities frequently create friction.

Lifestyle and Fairness Issues

  • Alteration or Renovation Issues: Unauthorized modifications to units or common spaces often spark tension.
  • Discrimination or Unequal Treatment: Boards that enforce rules inconsistently risk claims of bias or discrimination.

Recognizing these common issues allows boards to address them proactively, preventing disputes from turning into costly legal battles.

 

Discover how New York City’s leading Condo and Co-op law firm can help you resolve ownership and board disputes with clarity, strategy, and results.

Find Out More

Constructive Resolution Strategies

Effective board vs homeowner conflict resolution depends on approach and timing. The best outcomes often come from clear communication, a transparent process, and early intervention.

1. Start With Communication

Boards should always begin by documenting the issue and engaging the owner in a respectful, fact-based conversation. Invite the owner to submit their concerns in writing and schedule a meeting if appropriate. A documented exchange establishes accountability and goodwill while maintaining a clear record of events.

2. Consider Mediation

If initial talks fail, mediation offers an impartial and collaborative environment to find a middle ground. A neutral mediator facilitates discussion but does not make decisions. Belkin Burden Goldman frequently recommends mediation to resolve disputes while preserving community relationships and avoiding legal escalation.

3. Explore Arbitration or Negotiated Settlements

When disputes persist, arbitration or legal negotiation can provide structure without the cost and publicity of litigation. Arbitration decisions can be binding or non-binding depending on the agreement, while attorney-assisted negotiation gives both sides legal clarity before conflict intensifies. These methods protect relationships and confidentiality while moving toward enforceable outcomes.

By applying these layered strategies, boards can often achieve resolution while avoiding the financial and emotional toll of prolonged board of directors and owner disputes.

When Legal Support Becomes Necessary

Some conflicts, such as chronic nonpayment of fees, repeated bylaw violations, or harassment claims, can’t be solved with communication alone. In these cases, professional legal guidance ensures that the board’s actions remain compliant with state law and governing documents.

A law firm experienced in board of directors vs owners disputes, like Belkin Burden Goldman, can:

  • Review bylaws, rules, and prior board actions for legal compliance.
  • Draft or review notices, fines, and enforcement letters to avoid procedural errors.
  • Represent boards in mediation, arbitration, or litigation when needed.
  • Protect board members from personal liability stemming from official actions.

Legal support doesn’t mean a dispute has failed, but that the board is handling it strategically and within the limits of its authority.

Preventing Future Disputes Through Governance Best Practices

The best way to reduce board of directors and owner disputes is to prevent them through thoughtful governance. Boards that prioritize consistency, transparency, and communication are less likely to face claims of bias or neglect.

Preventive steps include:

  • Hosting regular open meetings for owner feedback.
  • Maintaining detailed minutes and financial reports.
  • Updating bylaws and rules to reflect modern legal standards.
  • Applying all policies uniformly across all residents.
  • Engaging legal counsel like Belkin Burden Goldman for annual governance reviews.

These proactive steps help maintain trust and prevent small misunderstandings from becoming legal conflicts.

How Boards Can Protect Themselves from Liability

Board members often worry about personal exposure when disputes arise. Fortunately, the “Business Judgment Rule” protects directors who act in good faith, follow proper procedures, and make informed decisions. Still, liability risk increases when decisions are undocumented or inconsistent.

To strengthen protection, boards should:

  • Obtain and maintain Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance.
  • Seek legal advice before enforcing penalties or initiating litigation.
  • Keep written records of every major board decision.
  • Follow all procedural rules outlined in bylaws and state law.

Belkin Burden Goldman helps board members understand these protections, ensuring directors can make informed decisions without fear of personal risk or misinterpretation.

Partner With Belkin Burden Goldman for Effective Condo Dispute Resolution

Condo governance demands balance, upholding community rules while respecting owner rights. When tension rises between the board of directors vs owners, clear communication, consistent governance, and timely legal guidance can prevent escalation.

Belkin Burden Goldman is New York City’s trusted condominium and co-op law firm, representing boards and associations in every stage of dispute resolution. From preventive governance strategies to mediation and arbitration, our attorneys help boards resolve issues efficiently and lawfully.

Don’t wait until a small disagreement becomes a major legal problem—contact Belkin Burden Goldman today to protect your board, your community, and your peace of mind.

Sign up for our newsletter, The BBG Update

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required